Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21670 (HP)

LAXMI CHAND v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/12492/2025 · 2025-08-01

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.12492 of 2025 Decided on: 1st August, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Laxmi Chand …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a representation to respondent No.2 on 22.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) for the redressal of his grievances raised in this writ petition. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Learned vice counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case respondent No.2/competent authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 22.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 01, 2025 Judge Mukesh