- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17469 CRP No. 218 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 218 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: SMT RENUKA SESHADRI, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, W/O SRI. SANTOSH KANKANALU, R/A BHAWAN TOWER, NEAR MAI TOWER, FLAT NO. 109, 1ST FLOOR, NAHDA, 1, DUBAI, U A E. REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY SRI. SESHADRI NAIDU AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA NAIDU, R/AT NO.113, SARJAPURA MAIN ROAD, NEAR BBMP OFFICE, DODDAKANHALLI, BENGALURU - 560035 …PETITIONER (BY SRI SURESH S LOKRE, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI SHRAVAN S LOKRE, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT SHOBHA PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O. K.S. PRABHAKAR, R/A NO.116/117, 1ST CROSS, BANASHANKARI, 3RD STAGE, 5TH BLOCK, BANGALORE – 560085. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI ABHINAV RAMANAND A, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17469 CRP No. 218 of 2025 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27.02.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.XXVIII IN O.S.NO.422/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, REJECTING THE I.A.NO.XXVIII FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the respondent has raised objections regarding maintainability of the Civil Revision Petition, while contending that the impugned order on I.A.No.28 in O.S.No.422/2017 has been passed on a Review Petition filed by the petitioner herein. Learned Counsel would therefore submit that having regard to the provisions contained in Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the present Civil Revision Petition is not maintainable, since the impugned order does not put an end to the suit. 2. Upholding the contention of the learned Counsel for the respondent, the Civil Revision Petition is - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17469 CRP No. 218 of 2025 dismissed as not maintainable. Liberty is however reserved to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the impugned order in accordance with law. 3. Pending Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47 CT:VN