VISHAL KUMAR S/O LAXMINARAYAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7627/2025 · 2025-08-11
Praveer Bhatnagar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21662 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21662 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:30986] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7627/2025 Vishal Kumar S/o Laxminarayan, R/o Khudiyaan, Police Station Bahtukalan, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Sub J/c Kotputli, Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Mewara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 11/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 35/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali, Karauli District Karauli for the offences under Sections 420 and 379 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time. The charge-sheet against the petitioner has been submitted before the concerned court. The present accused-petitioner has been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this court in another FIR No. 60/2025 registered with
[2025:RJ-JP:30986] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7627/2025] police station Shahpura District Jaipur (Rural) for the offences under Sections 318(4) of BNS and Sections 66-C and 66-D of IT Act, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that petitioner is a person of criminal antecedents, therefore considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, his bail application deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time. The charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been submitted before the concerned court, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Vishal Kumar S/o Laxminarayan, in connection with FIR No. 35/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali, KarauliDistrict Karauli shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned
[2025:RJ-JP:30986] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7627/2025] police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner on the same to the trial court every month.
In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /185