Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21656 (AP)

SUVVADA AMMANNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/15426/2025 · 2025-08-19

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010306342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 15426/2025 Between: 1. SUVVADA AMMANNA, W/O (LATE) SATYAM ,AGED 65 YRS , OCC. AGRICULTURAL, D.NO.3-25, TARLUVADA , VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. SUVVADA PAPARAO, S/O (LATE) SATYAM ,AGED 40 YRS , OCC.AGRICULTURAL, D.NO.3-25, TARLUVADA VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY , REVENUE(LAND) SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RDO OFFICE, BHEEMUNIPATNAM. 4. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, MRO OFFICE AT ANANDAPURAM , VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.. 5. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. THE SUB REGISTRAR, ANANDAPURAM SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE , ANANDAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to Issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particulalry one in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari to Call for the records pertaining to the impugned Proceedings No.340470/2023/E3 dt,30-l 1-2024 passed by the 2nd Respondent / District Collector, Visakhapatnam directing the Respondents 4 and 5 to take action as against the Petitioners as well as their Site in Plot No. 16 S.No.l/2F to extent of 1142 sq yds and Plot No. 17 in S.N0.1/2C to extent of 658 sq yds vide registered document No.4887/2023 dt,25-09-2023 all are Illegal, deliberate violation of procedure. Violation of Principles of natural justice. Violation of Principles of natural justice. Violation of Article 14,29,21,300-A- of the Constitution of India Consequently to Quash the impugned Proceedings 2 NO.340470/2023/E3 dt.30-11-2024 by Allowing the Writ Petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with filing the original impugned Proceedings dt.30-11- 2024 NO.340470/2023/E3 by permit to file the photo copy of the same and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to Stay of ail the further proceedings in pursuance of the impugned Proceedings dt.30-11- 2024 No.340470/2023/E3 including disposession of the petitioners in the property i.e.. Plot No. 16 S.N0.1/2F an extent of 1142 sq yds and Plot No.l7 in S.No.l/2C extent of 658 sq yds Chandaka Revenue Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District pending disposai of the main Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioners to Withdraw the Writ Petition. No. 15462 of 2025 and it’s I.As and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. ELURU SESHA MAHESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO I.A.No.3 of 2025 IN/AND WRIT PETITION No.15426 of 2025 COMMON ORDER:- The petitioners filed I.A.No.3 of 2025 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the main writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, due to subsequent changes. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, I.A.No.3 of 2025 is allowed and consequently, Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO Date: 20.08.2025 KBN