Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21648 (AP)

M/s Baji Enterprises, v. Anil Kumar Singhal, IAS,

CC/3175/2024 · 2025-07-06

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010306212024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3175/2024 Between: 1. M/S BAJI ENTERPRISES,, DOOR.NO. 7-20-626, 14TH LANE, SARADA COLONY, GUNTUR. REP. BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR, BAJI PATAN,S/O KHAJA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O DOOR.NO. 7-20-626, 14TH LANE, SARADA COLONY, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. M JANAKI IAS, W/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. CH SRIDHAR IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, PRIME HILL CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP OFFICE, BESIDE ULTRATECH READYMIX PLANT, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH PINCODE 522502 4. SHAIK ALEEM BASHA, COMMISSIONER OF MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI MAIN ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH, 522503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for willful disobedience of order of this Honourable Court passed in WP.No.3269 of 202, dt. 11-03-2024 passed by Hon'ble Sri Justice Subba Reddy Satti and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioner herein to implead the proposed 5 to 7 respondents as 5 to 7 respondents in the main C.C. No. 3175 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 3. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 11.03.2024 in W.P.No.3269 of 2024. 2. The petitioner filed W.P.No.3269 of 2024, complaining of the non- payment of Rs.40,11,538/- concerning the 10 works executed by him. The writ petition was disposed of, directing the respondent authorities to pay the amount. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri Dileep, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1, would submit that an amount of Rs.20,12,000/- was paid on 30.12.2024. In respect of the remaining 50% amount, the bills were uploaded in the CFMS portal on 12.05.2025, and the amount is credited to the petitioner’s account today. Learned counsel for the petitioner endorses the same. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 07.07.2025 TVN 136 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.3175 OF 2024 Date : 07.07.2025 TVN