Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21646 (PNJ)

BABU LAL AND ANR v. SANJEEV

FAO/800/2025 · 2025-02-19

Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-800-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 FAO-800-2025 (O&M) Decided on :19.02.2025 BABU LAL & ANR. ...Appellants VERSUS SANJEEV .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Anjum Ahmed, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Kshitiz Goel, Advocate for Caveator-respondent. **** SUDHIR SINGH , J (ORAL) Appellants have challenged order dated 12.12.2024 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Faridabad, whereby petition filed by the respondent-father under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, has been allowed and appellants have been directed to hand over the custody of the minor child to the respondent-father within one month from the date of passing of the judgment. 2 Mr. Kshitiz Goel, Advocate, appears and produces a copy of the order dated 07.02.2025 passed by this Court in CRWP-941-2025 titled as Sanjeev Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. Jyoti 2025.02.21 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document FAO-800-2025 (O&M) 2 3 A perusal of the aforesaid order would show that custody of the detenue has been handed over to the respondent-father being the natural guardian. 4 In view of the above, the present appeal has become infructous. 5 Disposed of as infructuous. 6 Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. ( SUDHIR SINGH ) JUDGE ( SUKHVINDER KAUR ) 19.02.2025 JUDGE jyoti3 Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Jyoti 2025.02.21 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document