IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11605 of 2024 Decided on: 06.01.2025 Rajani Devi … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : M/s Saurabh Ahluwalia, Digvijay Singh Thakur and Abhinav Purohit, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. AG. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Though, in terms of the previous order of the Court, no documents have been placed on record, however, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be served, in case, in case this petition is disposed of with the direction to the competent Authority to decide the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the petition as Annexure P-X with regard to her grievance within some reasonable time. 3. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that let the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-X, shall be decided by the competent 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Authority, strictly in light of the averments made therein as well as the judgments being relied upon by the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 06, 2025 (narender)