Sujeet Kumar v. Mr. Amir Subhani, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar
MJC/462/2023 · 2025-04-02
Anjani Kumar Sharan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21641 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21641 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.462 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3638 of 2021 ======================================================
1. Sujeet Kumar S/o Late Dayanand Singh, R/o Mohalla-Laljee Tola, P.s.- Gandhimaidan, Dist.-Patna. 2. Satish Kumar S/o Ganesh Sahu, R/o Mohalla-Maharajganj, P.S.-Aalamganj, Dist-Patna. 3. Ranjeet Kumar, S/o Late Lakhan Ram, R/o Vill-Kurtha, P.S.-Kurtha, Dist- Arwal. 4. Ajit Kumar Sahu, S/o Jhari Lal Sahu, R/o Vill-Pokharia, P.S.-Begusarai, Dist-Begusarai. 5. Kushan Yadav, S/o Ramanuj Yadav, R/o Vill.-Raghopur, P.S.-Bihta, Dist.- Patna. 6. Anil Kumar, S/o Late Ramatwar Rajak, R/o Vill-Parwania, P.S.-Sonversa, Dist-Saharsa. 7. Madhukar Kumar, S/o Karamchand Ram, R/o Mohalla-Ramjaipalnagar, P.S.-Rupaspur, Dist.-Patna. 8. Amrit Kerketta, S/o Helarius Kerketta, R/o Vill.-Bairiya, P.s.-Ramkanda, Dist-Garhwa, Jharkhand. 9. Shambhu Sharan Singh, S/o Vishwanath Singh, R/o Vill.-Rampur, P.S.- Khagaul, Dist. Patna. 10. Anil Kumar, S/o Mishri Prasad, R/o Vill.-Jiwachhpur, P.S.-Jiwacchhpur, Dist.-Madhepura. 11. Rabinder Toppo, S/o Domonic Toppo, SR/O Vill-Kurokhurd, P.S.-Mahua Danar, Dist.-Latehar, Jharkhand. 12. Subash Besra, S/o Motilal Besra, R/o Vill.-Barhabad, P.S.-Maheshpur, Dist.- Pakur, Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. Mr. Amir Subhani, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Sri S. Siddhartha, the Principal Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Dr. B. Rajender, the Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Sri Chaitanya Prasad, the Principal Secretary, Home Dept. Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5. Sri Rajvinder Singh Bhatti, Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6. Sri Vinay Kumar, the Inspector General of Police, Headquarter, Patna, Bihar. 7. Sri Ramawatar Sharma, the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 8. Sri Navin Chandra Jha, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Rohtas. Patna High Court MJC No.462 of 2023(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/3
9. Sri Rakesh Rathi, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna. 10. Sri Vikash Kumar, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Saran at Chhapra. 11. Sri Vivekanand, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Purnia. 12. Sri Vinod Kumar, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bhagalpur. 13. Sri Kshatraneel Singh, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Gaya. 14. Sri Manavjit Singh Dhillon, Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 15. Sri Pramod Kumar Yadav, Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur. 16. Sri Anand Kumar, Senior Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur. 17. Sri Avkash Kumar, Superintendent of Police, Begusarai. 18. Sri Jittendra Kumar, Superintendent of Police, Katihar. 19. Sri Ambrish Rahul, Superintendent of Police, Nawada. 20. Mrs. Sushant Kumar Saroj, Superintendent of Police, Navgachhiya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dr.
Kamal Deo Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh (Gp26) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 2 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party nos. 5 & 6, in which it is stated that the concerned Authority has passed a reasoned and speaking order in compliance of the order dated 29.07.2022 passed in CWJC No. 3638 of 2021. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the decision rendered by the concerned Authority vide memo no 190/P-5 dated 30.05.2023 (Annexure-A) is arbitrary, contrary to established law and lacks proper reasoning. 4. Considering the arguments advanced on behalf of the
Patna High Court MJC No.462 of 2023(2) dt.02-04-2025 3/3 parties and after perusing the materials available on record, it appears that the order dated 29.07.2022 has already been complied and hence, no case of contempt is made against the opposite parties. 5. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to challenge the order dated 30.05.2023 in appropriate forum, as may be advised to them, in accordance with law. divyanshi/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U