[2025:RJ-JP:29428] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7637/2025 1. Satish Urf Satyabeer Urf Satveer Urf Satta S/o Khyaliram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jainpur Ps Nangal Choudhary District Mahendragarh, Hariyana. (Presently The Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputali). 2. Ajeet @ Kalu S/o Ramfal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Bhedanti, Police Station Nangal Choudhary District Mahendragarh, Hariyana. (Presently The Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputali). 3. Rohitash Gurjar S/o Indraj, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Lujota, Police Station Nangal Choudhary District Mahendragarh, Hariyana. (Presently The Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputali). 4. Ramsingh S/o Jayram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kuhada Ps Sarund Tehseel Kotputali. (Presently The Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputali). 5. Madhusudhan @mannu @ Monu S/o Ashok Kumar, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dhanota Police Station Narnaul Sadar, District Mahendragarh, Hariyana Presently R/o Ward No. 13 Nangal Choudhary, Police Station Nangal Choudhary, District Mahendragarh, Hariyana. (Presently The Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputali). 6. Raju @ Rajesh S/o Ramotar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kuhada Police Station Sarund Tehseel Kotuptali. (Presently The Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputali). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9145/2025 Rambeer @ Bhalla S/o Amilal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Kunjota, Police Station Nangal Choudhary, District Mahendragarh, Haryana. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli, Distt. Kotputli-Behror). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta Ms. Shweta Mr. Vikas Kumar Jakhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S Dhakar, PP Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP [2025:RJ-JP:29428] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-7637/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.297/2024 registered at Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 308(2) & 324(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 308(2), 324(4), 310(2) & 118(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submit that there is allegation against the petitioners that they gave beatings to employees of the complainant who were working at the Limestone Mine and also took Rs.14,500 from the cash-box. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submit that petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and submits that petitioners are habitual offenders as several other cases have been registered against them. 4. I have considered the contentions. [2025:RJ-JP:29428] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-7637/2025] 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, especially considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Satish Urf Satyabeer Urf Satveer Urf Satta S/o Khyaliram, 2) Ajeet @ Kalu S/o Ramfal, 3) Rohitash Gurjar S/o Indraj, 4) Ramsingh S/o Jayram, 5) Madhusudhan @mannu @ Monu S/o Ashok Kumar, 6) Raju @ Rajesh S/o Ramotar and 7) Rambeer @ Bhalla S/o Amilal, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in the first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the [2025:RJ-JP:29428] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-7637/2025] petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /195-196