Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:278 CRL.P No. 5022 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5022 OF 2019 BETWEEN:
MR NAVEN L S/O N LAKSHMIPATHY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O NO.65, KSHIRABHADHI NILAYA, 3RD CROSS, ANJANADHRI LAYOUT, KONNANAKUNTE, KKP MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE 560062. …PETITIONER [BY SMT. KALPANA SUKUMAR, ADVOCATE (AB)] AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA MAGADI ROAD PS/CCB F & M, BENGALURU, REP.BY-STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE 560001.
2.
MR RAMA REDDY S/O HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, # RAGHAVENDRA NILAYA, 14 WARD, SADASHIVANAGAR, SIRGUPPA, BELLARY DISTRICT 583121. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKAT SATYANARAYAN, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.7241/2014 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE IV A.C.M.M., BENGALURU CITY AND PERMIT THEM TO COMPROMISE AND COMPOUND THE OFFENCES MADE IN C.C.NO.7241/2014, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE IV
Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:278 CRL.P No. 5022 of 2019
A.C.M.M., BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 406,468,471,420 AND 120B OF IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called in the afternoon session.
PF for issuance of notice to respondent No.2 with correct address and copy of the petition, annexures & documents are not furnished.
The order sheet dated 17.12.2024 reads as under:
"Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. Process fee for issuance of notice to respondent No.2 is not furnished even though the notice was issued as per the order dated 17.08.2021. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. However, to afford a final opportunity, list this matter after winter vacation, 2024."
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:278 CRL.P No. 5022 of 2019
Inspite of that, there is no representation. The petition is of the year 2019. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
SPV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4