1 2025:CGHC:23176 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3511 of 2025 1 - Dr. (Smt.) Heera Amlani W/o Shri Ashok Amlani Aged About 64 Years Post - Lecturer (L.B.) Retired, Government Higher Secondary School, Kosrangi, Block Arang, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya At Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya At Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Director Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - The District Education Officer Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanmay Thomas, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.06.12 09:55:52 +0530 2 S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order On Board 11/06/2025 1. The claim of the petitioner in this petition is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman in view of the circular dated 10.03.2017 issued by the state Government. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that with regard to award of the 1 and 2 Kramonnati Vetanman, some Circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt Sona Sahu Va Stats of Chhattisgarh and others in WA-261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. Petitioner is also entitled for the Kramonnati Vetanman in light of the Circular dated 10.03.2017 issued by the State Government. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to respondents-1, 3 and 4/competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA-261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this wit petition to respondents- 1,3 and 4/competent authorities annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA-261 of 2023 On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents 1, 3 and 4/competent authorities shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the Circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of 3 this Court in WA-261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, and it is for respondents- 1, 3 and 4 to consider the claim of petitioner on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Sagrika