[2025:RJ-JP:30303] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7592/2025 Vikram S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Patoli P/s Aligarh, District Tonk (Presently Prisoner In Central Jail, Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Mathur For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Vikram S/o Ramjilal in FIR No. 88/2025 dated 19.05.2025 registered at P.S. Aligarh, District -Tonk, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Section 112(2), 318(4), 319(2), 338, 340(2) of BNS, Section 13 of Rajasthan Gambling Ordinance, 1949 and Section 66-D of IT Act. 2. The applicant was arrested and has in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that as per police, the main accused is Sonu Meena and there were some transactions in the bank accounts of Akash and present applicant Vikram. He also [2025:RJ-JP:30303] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7592/2025] submits that not a single complaint has registered against the applicant for cheating or for gambling. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant- accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submits that the investigation will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused along with learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On basis of search and seizure by police on 18.05.2025, a criminal case was registered and on investigation police has found involvement of Sonu Meena, Shivam Kumar, Akash and Vikram Meena. There is no criminal antecedents against the appellant-accused Vikram. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. [2025:RJ-JP:30303] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7592/2025] 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Vikram S/o Ramjilal, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall mark his attendance on every first Monday of every month at concerned Police Station till disposal of the sessions case. (iv) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (v) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /136