IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.389 of 2025 Decided on: 06.05.2026 Rohini & another ….Petitioners Versus Ravi Shankar ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Yug Singhal, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Praveen Chandel, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral) It is contended by Mr. Yug Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioners, that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous. 2. Consequently, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous along with pending application(s), if any . ( Romesh Verma ) Judge May 06, 2026 (vt)