Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21629 (JHR)

ABHISHEK SINGH ALIAS VICKY ALIAS ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7130/2025 · 2025-08-08

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2025:JHHC:22874) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7130 of 2025 Abhishek Singh @ Vicky @ Abhishek Kumar Singh, aged about 36 years, S/o. Sri Ashok Sing, R/o. SAIL City, Block-E9, Flat No. 8A, P.O. & P.S.- Pundag, Dist.- Ranchi. … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Nishant Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, A.P.P. --- 02/08.08.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 595/2024 arising out of Chutia P.S. Case No. 117 of 2024, for the offences registered under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and charge has been framed under Sections 120B, 302/34, 201/34, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1- B)(a)/35, 26/ 35, 27/ 35 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-VI, Ranchi. Bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court vide B.A. No.9509 of 2024 by order dated 05.02.2025. On 27.05.2024, the petitioner had shot a DJ Operator namely Sandeep Kumar Pramanik @ Sandy of Xtreme Sports Bar and Grill. It was submitted that out of 11 prosecution witnesses, 4 witnesses have been examined in this case and informant has not identified the petitioner in the dock. Considering the nature of allegation and the fact that trial is in progress, I am not inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. The learned trial court shall expedite the trial. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Jay/-