Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21629 (BOM)

SHUBHANGI VINOD YESKE v. VINOD NARAYAN YESKE

MCA/215/2024 · 2025-05-05

Shri Kishore C Sant

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) mca215.24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 9 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 215 OF 2024 SHUBHANGI VINOD YESKE VERSUS VINOD NARAYAN YESKE Ms. Vishakha Gadekar h/f. Mr. Vivek Rathod, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Jangada, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J. DATE : 05.05.2025 PC :- 01. Heard learned Advocates for the parties. This application is filed by wife seeking transfer of proceeding pending before the learned Judge, Family Court, Parbhani to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Nanded. It is the case of the wife that she is staying with her parents and her baby girl. For this reason, she is finding it difficult to attend the proceedings at Parbhani. 02. Considering the above aspect, this Court is inclined to allow this application. Hence, following order :- ORDER (i) This Misc. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). (ii) After transfer of the proceeding, the applicant shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. If it is found that the 2025:BHC-AUG:13112 ( 2 ) mca215.24 adjournments are sought unnecessarily, the Trial Court shall pass appropriate order compensating the respondent-husband. (iii) The Trial Court shall try to decide the proceeding as early as possible and preferably within one year from the date of transfer. (iv) The respondent-husband is at liberty to apply for appearing through video conferencing. The Trial Court shall consider such request favourably. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2025/may25/mca215.24