Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21619 (CHH)

NIBAS ADHIKARI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3820/2022 · 2025-08-25

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:43412 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3820 of 2022 * - Nibas Adhikari S/o Shri Anil Chandra, Aged About 46 Years R/o Rural Health Orgnizer (Male), Pakhanjoor, Thana, Tahsil Post Pakhanjoor, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur., Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector, Kanker, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kanker, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh 4 - Block Medical Officer, Koylibeda, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared, even in two rounds For Respondents/State : Mr. Sanjeev Agrawal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 26/08/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order of suspension dated 20.05.2022 Annexure P-1 passed by the respondent No. 3. 2. The petitioner who is holding the post of Mitanin was placed under suspension by respondent No. 3 vide order dated 20.05.2022 and against said order, this petition has been preferred. 3. Mr. Sanjeev Agrawal, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents would submit that the order impugned is appealable Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.09.02 14:56:36 +0530 2 and the petitioner may make a representation before the respondent authorities. 4. Heard learned Panel Lawyer for the State 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has remedy to make a representation before respondent No. 2, this petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to make a detailed representation before respondent No. 2. If the order of suspension has not been revoked till date, the authority concerned in such a situation shall decide it expeditiously. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti