Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21618 (CHH)

SMT. MONIKA SONKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3309/2025 · 2025-05-07

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:21145 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3309 of 2025 1 - Smt. Monika Sonkar W/o Shri Bhupendra Sonkar Aged About 28 Years Staff Nurse, Working At P.H.C., Mahud, District - Balod (C.G.) 2 - Neeldhwaj Sahu S/o Shri Goukaran Aged About 33 Years Staff Nurse (Male), Working At P.H.C., Mahud (B) District - Balod (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary, Public Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Secretary, Finance Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Director, Health Services, 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Ms. Akanksha Verma, Panel Lawyer SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.05.09 15:48:41 +0530 2 / 2 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 08/05/2025 1. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners may be permitted to make a fresh representation before the concerned respondent authority, raising all grounds as they have raised in this writ petition, and on submission of such representation, concerned respondent authority may be directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with relevant law, rules/policies within the stipulated period which may be fixed by this Court. 2. The above prayer made by counsel for the petitioners is not opposed by learned counsel for the State/Respondent. 3. On the basis of submissions, without going into merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make a fresh representation raising all grounds as he raised in this writ petition before the concerned respondent authority within ‘three weeks’ from today and on submission of such representation, concerned respondent authority, in turn, is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with relevant law and rules/policies within an outer limit of ‘90 days’ from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar