APHC010305582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY.THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT APPEAL NO: 738 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters against the order dated 22.04.2025 in W.P. No. 10358 of 2025 on the file of High Court. Between: Kilani Narasinga Rao, S/o. Mutyalu, Aged about 55 years, R/o. Cheruvugattu Vinayaka Temple, 2 Visakhapatnam District. Near Street, Alipuram, Visakhapatnam, nd ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT No.13 AND 1. Seera Ramana, S/o. Pydiyya, Aged about 44 years, R/at D. No. 7- Nagar 121/18, Nandamuri Visakhapatnam DistrPct. Venkatapuram, Gopalapatnam, ...RESPONDENT N0.I/WRIT PETITIONER 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 4. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District. 5. The Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam District. 6. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam.- 7. The Tahsildar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. 8. The City Police Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. 9. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, PreLitigation Counselling Visakhapatnam. 10. The Deputy Commissioner Visakhapatnam. Forum, of Police, Zone-ll, Gajuwaka, 11. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, West Zone, 12. The Station Visakhapatnam. Police Station House Officer, Gopalapatnam Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. 13. The Subinspector of Police, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. 14. Kilani Anji Gopalapatnam Police Station, S/o. KilaniNarasinga Rao, Cheruvugattu Vinayaka Temple, 2nd Street, Aiipuram Visakhapatnam District. aged 35 years,Near Visakhapatnam, 15. KilaniTulasi, S/o. KilaniNarasinga Cheruvugattu Vinayaka Temple. 2nd Street, Aiipuram, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam District. Rao, aged 32 years. Near ...RESPONDENTS Nos.2 to 15/ RESPONDENT Nos.1 to 12,14 & 15 lA NO: 3 OF 907^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed In support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the Order dated 22.04.2025 of .this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 10358 of 2025, in favor of the respondent No. 1, pending disposal of the main Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MULLA SOHAIL SHAREEF Counsel for the Respondent No.1:SRI A. S. C. BOSE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 4 to 7:GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 8 to 13: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.14 & 15:— The Court made the following: JUDGMENT w APHC010305582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) f [3541] MONDAY. THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT APPEAL NO: 738/2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent be pleased to allow the writ appeal by setting aside the Order dated 22.04.2025 in W.P. No. 10358 of 2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Hon'ble Court through which the said writ petition was disposed of, and to dismiss the said writ petition in W.P. No. 10358 of 2025, and to pass Between: 1.KILANI NARASINGA RAO,, S/0. MUTYALU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. NEAR CHERUVUGATTU VINAYAKA TEMPLE. 2ND STREET. ALIPURAM DISTRICT. VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...APPELLANT AND 1. SEERA RAMANA, S/0. PYDIYYA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT D. NO. 7-121/18, NANDAMURI NAGAR, VENKATAPURAM, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUEDEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. PRINCIPAL 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2 4»' 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM. 7. THE TAHSILDAR, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 8. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER. VISAKHAPATNAM. 9. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRELITIGATION COUNSELLING FORUM. VISAKHAPATNAM. 10.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, . ZONE-LL, GAJUWAKA.VISAKHAPATNAM. 11.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WEST ZONE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 12.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOPALAPATNAM POLICE STATION, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 13.THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, . GOPALAPATNAM POLICE STATION, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 14.KILANI ANJI, S/0. KILANINARASINGA RAO, AGED 35 YEARS.NEAR CHERUVUGATTU VINAYAKA TEMPLE. 2ND STREET, ALIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 15.KILANITULASI, S/0. KILANINARASINGA RAO, AGED 32 YEARS. NEAR CHERUVUGATTU VINAYAKA TEMPLE, 2ND STREET, ALIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S); lANO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be Pleased todispense with filing of the full original Order Copy in W.P. No. 10358 of 2025, dated 22.04.2025 on the file of this Hon’ble High Court before this Hon’ble Court and to permit the Petitioner to file the uploaded copy of the order in the said Writ Appeal, and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2025 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be Pleased to condone the delay of (31 ) days in filing the above Writ Appeal against the Order dated 22.04.2025 of this Hon’ble Court in W.P. No. 10358 of 2025, and pass lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the Order dated 22.04.2025 of this Hon’ble Court in W.P. No. 10358 of 2025, in favor of the respondent No. 1, pending disposal of the main writ appeal,and to pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1.MULLA SOHAIL SHAREEF Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.ASCBOSE 3.GP FOR REVENUE 4 The Court made the following Judgment: (perHonWe sn justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave from this Court to withdraw this Writ Appeal. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/-V.DIWAKAR deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// SEC OFFICER To, . One CC to Sri Mulla Sohail Shareef, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri A. S. C. Bose, Advocate [OPUC] 3. TwoCCsto GPfor 4. Two CCs to :GP for Revenue, 5. Two CD Copies ; 1 Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] ssb HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 JUDGMENT WA No.738 OF 2025 dismissing the W.A. WITHOUT COSTS AS WITHDRAWN