938.BA.1237.25 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1237 OF 2025 ROHIT ALIAS LAKKI RATAN SHILLAK VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Magre Sunil G. and Adv. Magre Pratiksha Sunil APP for Respondent : Mr. N.B. Patil ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2025. PER COURT :- 1. After hearing learned advocate for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State, when this Court expressed disinclination to allow the application, learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. 2. Leave granted. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Considering the nature of the case, it would be proper to direct the trial court to conclude the trial as early as possible and in any case within a period of (12) Months from today, with a direction that it is a sessions case and it has to be decided in its literal sense that Session means once it is started it shall not be stopped. The trial court therefore, to proceed with the trial as expeditiously as possible and 2025:BHC-AUG:27300 938.BA.1237.25 -2- preferably within the aforesaid. It is clarified that if any other sessions case is expedited by the Hon’ble Supreme Court or by this court, the priority shall be given to those cases, if any, and thereafter, the sessions case, arising out of the present crime, shall be taken up for disposal. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) habeeb/