Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21600 (JHR)

BINITA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

C.M.P./697/2025 · 2025-08-22

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:25022 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P No. 697 of 2025 Binita Kumari, aged about 41 years, daughter of Shri Yugal Ram Sahu, Resident of Argora, P.O-Argora, P.S-Argora, Distt- Ranchi, Jharkhand. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Director, General-cum-inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagannathpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Dy. Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Armed Police Nepal House, P.O.- Doranda, P.S.-Doranda, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Commandant, Jharkhand Armed Police-10 Mahila battalion, Hotwar, P.O.- Hotwar, P.S.-Sadar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate Mr. Bhanu Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, AC to GA-I -------- Order No. 2/Dated: 22nd August 2025 The instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been preferred by the petitioner for modification in the order dated 17.06.2025 passed in W.P.(S) No. 1966 of 2020 in the cause title in view of the fact that by mistake the petitioner has stated her age as 47 years however she is only 41 years. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aged about 41 years, as such in place of 47 years it may be corrected as 41 years. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission and looking to the averments made in this Civil Miscellaneous Petition, the age of the petitioner be read as 41 years instead of 47 years in W.P.(S) No. 1966 of 2020. 4. The instant CMP stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit