MODEM VIJAYA RAMI REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/15308/2025 · 2025-06-24
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21593 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21593 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010305092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [i] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15308 OF 2025 Between:
1. Modem Vijaya Rami Reddy, S/o. Doraswamy Reddy Modem, Aged about 53 years Occ Business Presently R/o 8-3-261,Parameswari Nagar Sullurpeta - 524121, Tirupati District
2. Sri Venkateswara Constructiorts, Rep. by its Managing Partner Vijaya Rami Reddy, S/o. Doraswamy Reddy Modem, Aged about 53 Occ Business Presently R/o 8-3-261,Parameswari Nagar Sullurpeta - 524121, Tirupati District. Modem years ...Petitioners AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Energy, Govt of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravati, Guntur District
2. Southern Power Distribution Company of A P, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Tirupati - 517503
3. Executive Engineer Operations, Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P Puttur, Tirupati District
4. Executive Engineer Assessments, Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P Tirupati,
5. Superintending Engineer Operations, Southern Power Company of A.P Tirupati Division, Tirupati Distribution
6. Depuy Executive Engineer, Southern Power Distribution Nagulapuram OP, Tirupati District
7. Assistant Executive Engineer Operation Company of A.P Nagulapuram OP, Tirupati District
8. P Ramesh, Occ Assistant Deputy Executive Engineer, Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P Age and Other Nagulapuram OP, Tirupati District
9. Vijay Venkatesh, Occupation Assistant Distribution Company of A.P Age and Other Personal Varadaiahpalem, Tirupati District
10. District Magistrate and Collector Tirupati.. Company of A.P Southern Power Distribution Personal Details Not Known Engineer Southern Power Details Not known Tirupati District Collectorate Building ...Respondents praying that in the the High Court may be or direction, more particularly in the nature of Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, pleased to issue a Writ, Order Writ of Mandamus and Declare the actions of Respondent No.6 herein issuing the notices vide Lr.No.DY.EE/OSD/NPM/F.No. /D.No.590 Dt.05/May/2025 as illegal, unreasonable against basic tenets of natural justice, biased malafide, against the Electricity Act, 2003, against General Terms and Conditions of Supply of violating Article 14, 19, Distribution and Retail Supply Licensees 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and II. The action of Respondent No.7 herein issuing notice vide Lr.No.AEE/OA/PM/F.No. /D.No.82/25 dt. 16.06.2025 as illegal, unreasonable against basic tenets of natural justice, biased, malafide.
against the Electricity Act, 2003, against General Terms and Conditions of Supply of Distribution and Retail Supply Licensees, violating Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India
A Quash the said Provisional Assessment Orders issued in Lr.No.DY.EE/OSD/NPM/F.No. /D.No.590 Dt.05/May/2025 and notice/proceeding Lr.No.AEE/OA/PM/F.No. /D.No.82/25 dt. 16.06.2025. the issued vide quash lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Provisional Lr.No.DY.EE/OSD/NPM/F.No./D.No.590 Dt.:05/May/2025 along with other proceedings thereof issued by Respondent No.6 herein, pending disposal of this Writ Petition in the interest of equity, justice and fair play. Assessment Orders issued in lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders issued in /D.No.82/25 dt. 16.06.2025 issued by Respondent No.7 herein along with other proceedings thereof issued by Respondent No.6 herein. Lr.No.AEE/OA/PM/F.No.
lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to disconnect the electricity in the apartments pending disposal of this Writ Petition in the interest of equity, justice and fair play.
Counsel for the Petitioners: Dr.ANANTH S Counsel for the Respondent No.1:GP FOR ENERGY
T #1 Counsel for the Respondents No.2 to 7; SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA (SC FOR APSPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents No.8,9:---- Counsel for the Respondent No.10: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:
APHC010305092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) •I [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15308/2025 Between: Modem Vijaya Rami Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
I.Dr.ANANTH S y Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1 .VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2.GP FOR ENERGY The Court made the following:
:: ORDER :: Impugning the notices issued vide Lr.No.DY.EE / OSD / NPM / F.No. / D.No.590, dated 05.05.2025 by respondent No.6 and Lr.No.AEE / 0/ VPM / F.No. / D.No.82 / 25, dated 16.06.2025, by respondent No.7, the above writ petition has been filed. 2. At the hearing, Sri K.V. Rama Rao, learned Standing Counsel, on instructions of respondents 3 to 7, would submit that the respondents 6 & 7
SRS,J W.P.No.15308 of 2025 are withdrawing the aforementioned notices, due to some discrepancies.The same is recorded. 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner endorses the submission made by learned Standing Counsel.
4. Since the respondents 6 & 7 are withdrawing the aforementioned notices dated 05.05.2025 and 16.06.2025, no further adjudication is required in the writ petition.
5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
1. One CC to SRI. Dr.ANANTH S, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI. VENKATA RAMA Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY,
4. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE
5. Two CD Copies RAO KOTA, (SC FOR APSPDCL) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] NM
HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025
ORDER WP 15308/2025 SS 2 5 JUL 2025 IS - ''•■rrent SectioaXVy O' 5a CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS