Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21592 (RAJ)

RINKU MALAWAT @ RINKU SANSI S/O SHRI BHAGCHAND v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7597/2025 · 2025-06-20

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23385] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7597/2025 Rinku Malawat @ Rinku Sansi S/o Shri Bhagchand, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 103A, Radha Krishan Nagar, Mangyawas, Police Station Mansarowar, Jaipur (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.L. Pandey For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 20/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 483 of the BNSS arising out of FIR No.72/2024, registered at Police Station Mansarowar, District Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 8/20 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that no contraband has been recovered from the possession of the accused petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner has been implicated on the basis of the statements of the co-accused Dhanraj from whose possession the contraband was recovered and who stated that he has purchased this contraband from the accused petitioner. Counsel further submits that the co-accused Dhanraj, from whose possession the contraband (6 Kg ganja) was recovered, has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.02.2024 and the accused [2025:RJ-JP:23385] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7597/2025] petitioner is in custody for last more than one month, therefore he may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner and more particularly the fact that the co-accused Dhanraj, from whose possession the contraband was recovered, has already been enlarged on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J Gaurav Srivastava /Satyendra/33