Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21591 (KAR)

SMT. SATHYA v. NAGAMMA

RP/92/2022 · 2025-06-19

Anant Ramanath Hegde

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21465 RP No. 92 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REVIEW PETITION NO. 92 OF 2022 IN RSA NO.1171 OF 2012 BETWEEN: SMT. SATHYA, D/O LATE LAKSHMAN,AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O NO.19, HEBBALU COLONY, BASAVANAGUDI ROAD,METAGALLI POST, MYSURU - 570 016. WRONGLY SHOWN AS SATHYAMMA D/O BEERA IN RSA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI P MAHESHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. NAGAMMA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,ALLEGED W/O LAKSHMAN 2. RAJESH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,ALLEGED S/O LAKSHMAN, 3. MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,ALLEGED S/O LAKSHMAN RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ARE R/O NO.11, AMBEDKAR COLONY, GOKULAM 2ND CROSS, MYSURU - 570 001. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, MYSURU CITY CORPORATION,MYSURU - 570 001. Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21465 RP No. 92 of 2022 5. HEALTH OFFICER, MYSURU CITY CORPORATION,MYSURU - 570 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI HARISH M G, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R3, R2 IS SERVED, SRI GAURAV G K, ADV. FOR R4 & R5) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO 1. REVIEW THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN RSA NO. 1171/2012 DATED 21/10/2019 AND REVIEW THE SAME BY GRANTING AN OPPORTUNITY TO THE PETITIONER. 2. PLEASED TO PASS ANY OTHER ORDER OR JUDGMENT AS THIS HON'BLE COURT FEELS DEEM FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the dispute is settled out-of-Court. He further submits that oral instructions from the party is not to press the appeal. 2. Submissions are placed on record. 3. Review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE BRN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31