Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Jharkhand · body
2025 DAILYLAW 21591 (JHR)
SUDAM PRADHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
WPC/5217/2025 · 2025-09-18
Rajesh Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21591 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21591 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:28795 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No.5217 of 2025
1. Sudam Pradhan, aged about 74 yrs, S/o. Late Muchiram Pradhan
2. Malti Devi, aged about 46 yrs, D/o. Sudam Pradhan, Both, R/o. Vill.- Itagarh, Panchayat- Itagarh, P.O.- Itagarh, P.S.- Gamharia, Dist: Seraikella Kharswan
3. Vidyavati Devi, aged about 48 yrs, W/o. Manik Gope, D/o. Sudam Pradhan, R/o. Vill- Dudra, Panchayat- Dudra, P.O.-Dudru, P.S.- Gamharia, Dist: Seraikella – Kharsawan
4. Padma Gope, aged about 40 yrs, W/o. Mahesh Gope, D/o. Sudam Pradhan, R/o. Murakati Basti, Indranagar, P.O.-Lohabasa, P.S.- Birsa Nagar, Jamshedpur, Dist: East Singhbhum
5. Kalpana Devi, aged about 55 yrs, W/o. Arun Pradhan, D/o. Sudam Pradhan, R/o. Vill. Harlda, Panchayat- Bandhdih, P.O.- Madhupur, P.S.
Seraikella, Dist: Seraikella Kharsawan
6. Rewati Devi, aged about 45 yrs, W/o. Parsu Ram Gope, D/o Sudam Pradhan, R/o Gour Basti, Near Radha Krishan Mandir, P.O.+P.S. Mango,
Jamshedpur, Dist: East Singhbhum …… Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Deputy Commissioner Seraikella, P.O.+ P.S
Seraikella, District: Seraikella Kharsawan,
Jharkhand
3. Land Reform Deputy Collector, Seraikella, P.O.+ P.S Seraikella, District: Seraikella Kharsawan,
Jharkhand
4. Circle Officer, Rajnagar, P.O. + P.S. Rajnagar, Dist: Seraikella Kharsawan, Jharkhand. …... Respondents ---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhishek Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Kumar Pawan, A.C to S.C. (Mines)-III ---------
02/Dated: 18
th September, 2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh one with better particulars
2.
Learned counsel for the other side has no objection.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of - 1 - W.P.(C) No.5217 of 2025
2025:JHHC:28795 with the aforesaid liberty.
4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands
disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 18th September, 2025 Ravi-Chandan/- - 2 - W.P.(C) No.5217 of 2025