Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 215901 (MAD)

G.Shanmuganathan, v. The District Revenue Officer,

WP(MD)/28987/2025 · 2025-10-30

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.28987 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD)No.28987 of 2025 and WMP (MD) No.22464 of 2025 G.Shanmuganathan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram, District Collector Office, Ramanathapuram District 623501. 2. Muruganandham Represented by His Power of Attorney 3. T.Muthukumar 4. Dhanasekaran ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Ist Respondent dispose of the Petitioner`s Revision Petition dated 07.08.2025, in respect of property in Survey No.263/1, measuring 1.62 acres, situated at Soorankottai Village, Ramanathapuram District, within a time frame to be stipulate by Hon`ble Court and direct the 2nd to 4th Respondents not to alienate encumber or create any third-party rights in respect of the subject property pending dispose of the revision petition, thereby preserving the status quo till the final orders passed by the 1st 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.28987 of 2025 Respondent. For Petitioner :Mr.AS.Neya For Respondents :Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate for R1 Mr.N.Madhava Govindan for R2 to R4 O R D E R After filing a revision petition before the District Revenue Officer, the petitioner seeks the early disposal thereof and also seeks to prevent respondents 2 to 4 from alienating, encumbering or creating third party rights in respect of the subject property. Upon receipt of notice, learned counsel has entered appearance on behalf of respondents 3 and 4. He submits that the relief of restraining respondents 2 to 4 from dealing with the property pending disposal of the revision petition is not maintainable in a petition seeking a mandamus. He submits that he has no objection to the early disposal of the revision petition. 2. Learned Government Advocate submits that the revision petition would be disposed of on merits within three months. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.28987 of 2025 3. The petitioner has approached the District Revenue Officer by way of revision petition. In case the petitioner seeks interim relief, it is always open to the petitioner to seek such relief before the District Revenue Officer. In a writ of mandamus seeking early disposal of the revision petition, I am not inclined to consider such request. 4. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the District Revenue Officer to consider and dispose of the revision petition on merits within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after providing a reasonable opportunity to all parties thereto. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 30.10.2025 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No PKN 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.28987 of 2025 To The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram, District Collector Office, Ramanathapuram District 623501. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.28987 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. PKN W.P.(MD)No.28987 of 2025 30.10.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis