Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2159 (PAT)

Shiv Kumari Devi @ Shiv Kumari @ Makhola Devi @ Mashola Devi v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./72830/2025 · 2026-02-27

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72830 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-340 Year-2023 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Shiv Kumari Devi @ Shiv Kumari @ Makhola Devi @ Mashola Devi W/O Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Prasad R/O Vill.- Sarkuna, Dulhin Bazar, Dist.- Patna 2. Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Prasad S/O Late Kamla Yadav R/O Vill.- Sarkuna, Dulhin Bazar, Dist.- Patna 3. Nikki Kumari D/O Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Prasad R/O Vill.- Sarkuna, Dulhin Bazar, Dist.- Patna 4. Brajesh Kumar @ Nand S/O Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Prasad R/O Vill.- Sarkuna, Dulhin Bazar, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Rudal Kumar S/O Ramashish Prasad @ Matur Yadav R/O Vill.- Tarpura, P.S.- Masaudhi, Dist.- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jagjit Roshan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP Mr.Girish Chandra Jha,Adv.for OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 27-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case, registered for the offence under Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. As per prosecution case, sister of informant was married with co-accused Santosh Kumar in the year 2019 and after the marriage, she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by the accused persons for dowry and ultimately, on 13.10.2023, she was killed by the accused persons. 4. Petitioner no. 1 is mother-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72830 of 2025(3) dt.27-02-2026 2/2 father-in-law, petitioner no. 3 is unmarried sister-in-law and petitioner no. 4 is brother-in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody since 18.02.2026. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Danapur (Patna) / concerned Court in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 340 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T