IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 21094 & 21096 of 2025 Decided on: 02.01.2026 1. CWP No. 21094/2025 Ranjay Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No. 21096/2025 Prem Jyoti …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Surinder Prakash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent(s): Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in both the petitions. 2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 applicability of Yashwant Kumar Vs. State of H.P.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the petitioner(s) would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 2nd January, 2026(rohit) 2CWP No. 8148 of 2022, decided a/w connected matters on 21.03.2024