Karanki Nagalakshmi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/20164/2020 · 2025-08-20
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21588 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21588 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010304832020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20164/2020 Between:
1. KARANKI NAGALAKSHMI,, W/O. KARANKI NAGARAJU R/O.
SALAPADU VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, BLOCK NO.2, GROUND FLOOR, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE AMARAVATI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, LENIN CENTER, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA 520 002, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OFFICE OF THE COLLECTORATE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 4. THE SECRETARY, SALAPADU GRAMAPANCHAYAT, SEKURU SIVARU VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHEBROLU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, CHEBROLU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, SELAPADU GRAM PANCHAYAT, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2
8. KARANKI RANJITH KUMAR, S/O. KARANKI SAMBAIAH, R/O. 13- 192, SALAPADU VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522 213. 9. KARANKI PAVAN KUMAR, S/O. KARANKI SAMBAIAH, R/O. 13-192, SALAPADU VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522 213
10.
KARANKI PADMAVATHI, W/O. KARANKI SAMBAIAH, R/O. 13-192, SALAPADU VILLAGE, CHEBROLU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 213 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, direction or more particular one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and A.Declare the inaction of the Respondent No.5 and 6 over the official complaints dated 26.09.2020 and 09.10.2020 issued by the Respondent No.4 in relation to the illegal construction of the unofficial respondents without obtaining relevant permissions including building permission as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and in violation of Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No. 5 and 6 to register FIR against the unofficial respondents for making illegal constructions and disobeying the directions of the Government Servant and also direct them to stop the illegal construction forthwith B.Declare the actions of the Respondent No.2 in not taking any effective action to stop the admitted illegal construction of the unofficial respondents without obtaining relevant permissions including building permission as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and in violation of Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to stop the illegal construction forthwith and demolish the same in accordance with law since the same is being constructed admittedly without any building permission C.Declare the actions of the Respondents No.3 and 4 in not taking any effective action to stop the admitted illegal construction of the unofficial respondents without obtaining relevant permissions including building permission as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and in violation of Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No. 3 and 4 to stop the illegal construction forthwith and demolish the same in accordance with law since the same is being constructed admittedly without any building permission D.Pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.5 to 6 to take action against the complaints dated 26-09-2020 and 09-10-2020 issued by the Respondent No.4 against the unofficial respondents and stop the illegal construction in accordance with law pending the disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that
in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 to immediately stop the illegal construction in accordance with law, pending the disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DANDUGULA SATYA SIVA DARSHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Y KOTESWARA RAO
2. HARANADHA RAJU KATTA
4
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20164 of 2020
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a Writ, Order, direction or more particular one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and A.)Declare the inaction of the Respondent No.5 and 6 over the official complaints dated 26.09.2020 and 09.10.2020 issued by the Respondent No.4 in relation to the illegal construction of the unofficial respondents without obtaining relevant permissions including building permission as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and in violation of Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No. 5 and 6 to register FIR against the unofficial respondents for making illegal constructions and disobeying the directions of the Government Servant and also direct them to stop the illegal construction forthwith B.)Declare the actions of the Respondent No.2 in not taking any effective action to stop the admitted illegal construction of the unofficial respondents without obtaining relevant permissions including building permission as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and in violation of Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to stop the illegal construction forthwith and demolish the same in accordance with law since the same is being constructed admittedly without any building permission C.)Declare the actions of the Respondents No.3 and 4 in not taking any effective action to stop the admitted illegal construction of the unofficial respondents without obtaining relevant permissions including building permission as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and in violation of Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No. 3 and 4 to stop the illegal construction forthwith and demolish the same in accordance with law since the same is being constructed admittedly without any building permission D.)Pass.…”
5
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the unofficial respondents would submit that the said construction is completed and it is not the case of the petitioner that as if the unofficial respondents encroached any land of the petitioner. He would further submit that the petition may be disposed of since the relief has become infructuous.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be
disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedies according to law.
4. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.08.2025. UPS
6
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.20164 of 2020
Dated.21.08.2025
UPS
73