Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21586 (CHH)

DR. K.N. MISHRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3334/2020 · 2025-09-07

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45499 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3334 of 2020 1 - Dr. K.N. Mishra S/o Ram Vallabh Mishra, Aged About 60 Years Working As Stenographer Grade - 1/ Private Secretary, Office Of The Director, Tribal Research And Training Institute, Sector 24, Nav A Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Scheduled Caste And Schedule Tribe Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Commissioner, Department Of Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. A. Sandhya Rao, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 & 3 : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.09.11 11:54:20 +0530 2 Order on Board 08/09/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has already been granted promotion vide order dated 02.01.2021 and he has been promoted on the post of Assistant Director, Department of Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe Development, therefore, this petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents have not opposed the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. In view of above submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi