Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 215853 (MAD)

G.R.Parvathy v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of police,

WP Crl.(MD)/2635/2025 · 2025-12-19

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl.(MD) NO. 2635 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.Crl.(MD) No.2635 of 2025 G.R.Parvathy Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State of Tamilnadu, Represented by the Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District. 2.State of Tamilnadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, Pettai Police Station, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 3.R.Ponnuraj Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): M/s.B.Bhuvaneshvari, for Mr.A.Gopal For Respondent(s): Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.side) Prayer: This petition is filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to give police adequate Police protection for worshiping and conducting guru pooja on 23.12.2025 by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 15.12.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl.(MD) NO. 2635 of 2025 ORDER This petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to give adequate Police protection for worship and conducting guru pooja on 23.12.2025 by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 15.12.2025. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that she inherited the rights to do pooja from one Karuppasamy. The said Karuppasamy is one of the devotees of Sri Nithyanandhaswamigal Ponnambalaswamigal for which the petitioner had relied on the contents of the suit filed by one Shanmugasundaram. The said Shanmugasundaram has claimed that their ancestors are the original owner of the property and they have right over the temple and had filed a suit in O.S.No.545 of 2022 on the file of Munsif Court, Tirunelveli. The said facts are stated in the affidavit filed by one Pon Rathna, who has filed a Writ Petition in W.P.Crl.(MD) No.2711 of 2011 inter alia, praying to forbear the respondent Police from interfering in the duties of the said Pon Rathana as Trustee to Administer the Sri Nithyanandhaswamigal Ponnambalaswamigal Temple situated at Korangu Mada Theru, Puthupettai, Tirunelveli District. 3. In the present petition, the petitioner claims the right as a poojari / devotee to conduct Guru Pooja and worship. The petitioner has not claimed any right to administer Sri Nithyanandhaswamigal Ponnambalaswamigal Temple. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl.(MD) NO. 2635 of 2025 4. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that any person who is a descendant and devotee of Sri Nithyanandhaswami Ponnambalaswamigal is entitled to worship in the said temple. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner. The petitioner is permitted to conduct the Guru Pooja and worship in the said and up to 50 persons may accompany her. The petitioner shall not raise any provocative slogans. The petitioner and the 3rd respondent shall not create any law and order problem. 5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 19.12.2025 Indu Note: Issue order copy on 19.12.2025. To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Pettai Police Station, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SRIMATHY.J, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl.(MD) NO. 2635 of 2025 Indu WP Crl.(MD) No.2635 of 2025 19.12.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis