Marise Tata Rao @ Appalaraju, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/20205/2020 · 2025-08-18
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21580 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21580 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010305312020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20205/2020 Between:
1. MARISE TATA RAO @ APPALARAJU,, S/O. LATE RAMA RAO, R/O D.NO. 2-60, RAMALAYAM STREET, OLD KANDARADA, PITHAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ELURU RANGE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA.
4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PRATHIPADU POLICE STATION, PRATHIPADU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PRATHIPADU POLICE STATION, PRATHIPADU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
7. MARISE VEERA NAGA LAKSHMI, W/O LATE RAMA SANKAR, D/O MAMIDI APPA RAO, VOTRIMANGI VILLAGE, PRATHIPADU
2
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the official respondents in interfering in civil disputes and insisting the petitioner to settle the matter with the 7th respondent according to their terms and conditions and further threatening the petitioner with dire consequences to implicate the petitioner in false cases, as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and also in violation of the principles of natural justice and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and for a consequential relief of a specific direction to the official respondent no. 5 and 6 to not to interfere in civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent No, 7 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“....to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the official respondents in interfering in civil disputes and insisting the petitioner to settle the matter with the 7th respondent according to their terms and conditions and further threatening the petitioner with dire consequences to implicate the petitioner in false cases, as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and also in violation of the principles of natural justice and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and for a consequential relief of a specific direction to the official respondent no. 5 and 6 to not to interfere in civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent No, 7 and to pass...”
2. None represented for the petitioner.
3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that in the light of the interim orders dated 03.11.2020, no further orders are required to be passed in this matter.
4. As can be seen from the interim order dated 03.11.2020, this Court
directed the police not to call the petitioner to the police station in respect of the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the respondent No.7.
5. In that view, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.08.2025 MH
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
31
W.P.No.20205 of 2020
Dt.19.08.2025
MH