APHC010305122021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18383/2021 Between: 1. CHINTHAKAYALA SITHA, W/O SATHYANARAYANA PRASAD,AGED 57 YEARS, 0CC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. C/O SURLA SWAMY NAIDU, GUMMUDUGONDA, NATHAVARA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. CHINTHAKAYALA ARUNA, DEVI W/O MEDAPA REDDY MALLAIAH NAIDU, AGED. 31 YEARS, 0CC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. C/O SURLA SWAMY NAIDU, GUMMUDUGONDA, NATHAVARA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, NARSIPATNAM RURAL POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARSIPATNAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. R SESU KUMARI, W/O PEDARAJU BABU, R/O. MAIN ROAD, PEENARI PALEM, NARSIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM 2 DISTRICT. 6. R RAGHURAM TEJA, S/O PEDARAJU BABU, R/O. MAIN ROAD, PEENARI PALEM, NARSIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. CHINTHAKAYALA NAIDU BABU, S/O VEKANNA PATRUDU, AGED. 66 YEARS, R/O. GUMMUDUGONDA VILLAGE, NATHAVARA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. CHINTHAKAYALA MADHU NAIDU, S/O NAIDU BABU, AGED. 38 YEARS, R/O. GUMMUDUGONDA VILLAGE, NATHAVARA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 9. CHINTHAKAYALA PRAKASH, S/O NAIDU BABU, R/O. C/O SURLA SWAMY NAIDU, GUMMUDUGONDA VILLAGE, NATHAVARA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents no-3 and 4 in interfering with the civil disputes and thereby threatening the petitioners to handover the possession of properties subject in S.A.No.1811 of 2018 on this Hon'ble Court to the Respondent no-6 herein is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents no.3 and 4 not to call the petitioners to handover the possession of the properties subject in S.A.No.1811 of 2018 on this Hon'ble Court to the unofficial Respondents and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents no-3 & 4 not to interfere and threaten the petitioners to handover the possession of the properties to an extent of Ac.0-92 cents in Sy.No.11, Ac.0-92 cents in Sy.No.14, Ac.0-03 cents in Sy.No.60/2, Ac.0-21 cents in Sy.No.79, Ac.0- 74 cents in Sy.No.53/1, Ac.1-00 cents in Sy.No.18, Ac.0-35 cents in Sy.No.51/1 & 51/2, Ac.0-1-54 cents in Sy.No.50 & 39/1, Ac.0- 88 cents in Sy.No.19/1, Ac.0-58 cents in Sy.No.19/3, Ac.0-13 cents in Sy.No.52/1, Ac.0- 41 cents in Sy.No.41, Ac.1-02 cents in Sy.No.63/1, Ac.0-65 3 cents in Sy.No.62/1 of Gummudugonda Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District pending the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the station name of the Respondent no-3 in the cause title as "Natavaram" instead of "Narsipatnam" and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T D PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18383 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents Nos.3 and 4 in interfering with the civil disputes and thereby threatening the petitioners to handover the possession of properties subject in S.A.No.1811 of 2018 on this Hon’ble Court to the Respondent No.6 herein is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents Nos.3 and 4 not to call the petitioners to handover the possession of the properties subject in S.A.No.1811 of 2018 on this Hon’ble Court to the unofficial Respondents, and pass….” 2. Heard Sri T.D.Phani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and unofficial respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondents. 5 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.09.2025. SNI 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18383 of 2021 Dated.17.09.2025 SNI 105