IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 840 of 2025 Date of Decision: 26.08.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Amrit Lal & Anr. ……...Petitioners Versus N.P.Singh & Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record copy of communication dated nil issued under the signatures of Registrar, O/o Engineer-in-Chief, Nirmal Bhawan, HPPWD, Shimla, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 25.08.2025, perusal whereof reveals that respondents, after having considered the case of the petitioners, rejected the representation. Since there was only direction to consider the case of the petitioners, in terms of observations made in the judgment, alleged to have been violated and respondents have strictly complied with the judgment by considering the representation of the petitioner, no action of the respondents can be said to be contumacious. 2. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Liberty is reserved 2 to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to order dated 25.08.2025 passed in purported compliance of the judgment, alleged to have been violated. August 26, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge