Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21569 (CHH)

M/S ANUJ INDUSTRIES (WRONGLY MENTIONED AS HARISHARANPOHA MILL) v. Ramadhar Bansal

WP227/340/2021 · 2025-05-02

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20219 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 340 of 2021  M/s Anuj Industries (Wrongly Mentioned As Harisharanpoha Mill) Surajpura, Proprietor Vijay Gehani, Age 41 Yeras, S/o Late Gopichand Gehani R/o Bajrang Ward, Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Ramadhar Bansal S/o Chotai Bansal Aged About 44 Years R/o Levai, Tehsil Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 2. Meena Bansal W/o Ramadhar Bansal R/o Levai, Tehsil Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3. Chief Executive Engineer C.S.P.D.C.L. Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Vinod Pandey, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 02-05-2025 1) As per office instruction, the proceeding of Application No. 19/ EC Act/ 2019 filed under the provisions of Employees Compensation Act has already been concluded by the learned Commissioner, Employees Compensation, Baloda Bazar on 29.01.2024, therefore, in opinion of 2 this Court, nothing survives for adjudication. 2) Consequently, writ petition stands dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya