Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110673 Court No. - 87 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7529 of 2025 Applicant :- Vasu Panwar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sushil Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J. 1. Sri Anil Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appears for the applicant has filed rejoinder affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appears for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. By means of this bail application the accused-applicant has prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No.17 of 2024 for offence under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 352, 336, 338, 340 of B.N.S., and Section 66D of I.T. Act, P.S. Cyber Crime, District Muzaffar Nagar. 4. Learned counsel appears for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case, lodged by the Smt. Babita with the allegation that her son running a shop of recharge and money transfer at Shyamli bus stand, accused Vasu Panwar used to come to his shop and has duped an amount of Rs. 22,48,000/- by showing the screenshot of transfer of the money. The charge sheet has been submitted. Learned counsel further submits that the accused used to invest money in the business of informant's son and when did not get return, false and fictitious FIR has been lodged against the accused, in which the accused is in jail since January, 2025. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and submits that the accused has been charge sheeted in the matter. There is ample evidence against the accused to show that the accused on the basis of false screenshot shown the transfer of the money and, therefore, duped an amount of Rs. 22,48,000/- from informant's son. 6. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submission made by the parties. 7. The record prima facie, reveals that the charge sheet has been submitted against the accused. There is apparent commercial transaction between the son of the informant and accused, on the basis of which, the FIR has been registered. The date of transaction has not been mentioned in the FIR. Though, the FIR has been lodged on 15.07.2024. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since January, 2025. 8. As such, without touching the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the accused-applicant, Vasu Panwar involved in above mentioned case crime number be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Mini (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad