RAVINDRA SUBHASH GANGODE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SEC. TRIBAL DEV. DIVISION AND ANR
WP/6918/2025 · 2026-03-04
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2156 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2156 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
12.WP-6918-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6918 OF 2025 Ravindra Subhash Gangode ….Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr.
….Respondents ---- Mr. Divyesh K. Jain i/b. Mr. Jay Salunke for the Petitioner. Mr. Aditya R. Deolekar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. ----
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : 4th MARCH, 2026 P.C. :-
1. The Petitioner prays that his representation dated 24th October, 2024 be considered on its merits.
2. The learned AGP has taken instructions and submits that the case of the Petitioner would be considered as per the directions issued by this Court in paragraph nos.31 (a to d) of the
judgment dated 29th April, 2022 delivered in Writ Petition No.1596 of 2021 filed by Vikram Bawajya Valvi and Ors. v/s. The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary and Anr. Gauri Gaekwad 1 of 2 GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date: 2026.03.06 11:13:43 +0530
12.WP-6918-2025.odt
3. The representation shall be considered within a period of 45 days from today. It is clarified that when the Petitioner's turn comes, his case would be processed strictly in view of the above guidelines of this Court set out in Vikram Bawajya Valvi and Ors. (supra).
4. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is satisfied and this Petition can be disposed off in the light of the statement made by the learned AGP.
5. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Gauri Gaekwad 2 of 2