1 2025:CGHC:22701 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3512 of 2025 1 - Panchuram Shrivas S/o Shri Ramkhillavan Shrivas Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village- Umariya, Post- Bitkuli, Tahsil- Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Santram Maravi S/o Shri Punitram Maravi, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village- Umariya, Post- Bitkuli, Tahsil- Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Sushil Kumar Pandey S/o Shri Vijay Pandey, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Nagar Panchayat, Bodri, Post- Chakarbhata, Tahsil- Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Laxmi Kaiwart W/o Shri Mahesh Kaiwart, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village and Post- Bartori, Tahsil- Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Smt. Saroj Verma W/o Shri Manharan Verma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village- Sevati, Post Office- Bartori, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Mohit Ram Sahu S/o Shri Gangaram Sahu, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village- Lakhsar, Tahsil- Lormi, District- Mungeli (C.G.) 7 - Mahesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Mahettar Ram Sahu, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Post- Khamhi, Tahsil- Lormi, District- Mungeli (C.G.) 8 - Teklal Sahu S/o Shri Itawaree Ram Sahu, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village- Dhaurabhath Chandeli, District- Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary, Department of Panchayat Evam Gramin Vikas, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 3 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector (Jila Mission Sanchalak, Rajiv Gandhi Mission) District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 09-06-2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this moment petitioners are not pressing this writ petition on merits and are only seeking direction to respondent No.3 to take decision on the pending representation within specified time. 2. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners is not opposed by the learned State counsel. 3. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to take decision on the representation dated 30-05-2022 (Annexure-P/1) submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil