1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3529 of 2025 1 - Rukmani Thakur W/o Shivkumar Singh Thakur Aged About 65 Years R/o Shanti Nagar Magarlodh Ward No.2 Near Om Shanti Bhawan Magarlodh District - Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Panchayat And Rural Development Vikas Bhawan Sector - 19, North Block Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Dhamtari District - Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Magarlodh District - Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Sunita Jain, Advocate. For State : Shri Rajkumar Gupta, Addl. AG along with Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 09.06. 202 5 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, who retired on 30.06.2022 from the office of respondent No. 5, is seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities to grant pension to the petitioner from the date of superannuation. Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2025.06.09 15:09:57 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner superannuated from service on 30.06.2022, but till date the respondents have not released the pension of the petitioner. 3. Learned State counsel submits that if the petitioner will approach before the respondent authority by filing a fresh representation, the same will be considered in accordance with law within the stipulated time. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 5. From perusal of the pleadings, it appears that petitioner has been superannuated on 30.06.2022 but till date she is not getting her pension though 3 years have already been expired. 6. Considering the same, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the petitioner to approach the respondents No.3 to 5 by filing a fresh representation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order by reiterating her claims. In case of filing of such representation, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the same and take necessary steps for disbursal of pension to the petitioner within a further period of 30 days from date of receipt of the representation. 7. With the aforesaid observation/ direction, the writ petition is disposed of. 8. The Petitioner is at liberty to apprise the concerned respondents about the order of this court. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge