[2025:RJ-JP:32126] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7563/2025 Mukesh Pareek @ Sanchit S/o Sh. Gangadhar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o House No. 739, Near Hanuman Temple, Agroha, Police Station Agroha, District Hisar, Haryana, At Present Tenant Flat No. 502, Prince Place Lalpura Road, Police Station Karni Vihar, Raj. Central Jail Jaipur, Raj. (Presently Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7564/2025 1 . Shailendra @ Suraj @ Bharat S/o Sh. Hansraj, Aged About 24 Years, R/o House No. 730, Near Hanuman Temple, Agroha, Police Station Agroha, District Hisar, Haryana, At Present Tenant Flat No. 502, Prince Place Lalpura Road, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur, Raj. Central Jail Jaipur, Raj. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). 2 . Ankit @ Hani S/o Sh. Ganga Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o House No. 730, Near Hanuman Temple, Agroha, Police Station Agroha, District Hisar, Haryana, At Present Tenant (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8933/2025 Rohitashv Kumar Swami @ Rohit @ David S/o Shri Ghasiram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Bhagega, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Thana Sadar, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP [2025:RJ-JP:32126] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7563/2025] ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, Mr. Mukesh Dudi, Mr. Himanshu, Mr. Ashvin Garg, Ms. Vaishnavi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 18/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.383/2025 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 111(2)(b), 111(3) and 61(2) of BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. They further submit that the petitioners are in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time. Apart from the petitioner- Mukesh Pareek, there are no criminal antecedents against the other co-accused, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications and submitted the factual report. The same is taken on record. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsels for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the petitioners are in [2025:RJ-JP:32126] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7563/2025] custody since long and further trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Mukesh Pareek @ Sanchit S/o Sh. Gangadhar, 2. Shailendra @ Suraj @ Bharat S/o Sh. Hansraj, 3. Ankit @ Hani S/o Sh. Ganga Singh and 4. Rohitashv Kumar Swami @ Rohit @ David S/o Shri Ghasiram, in connection with FIR No.383/2025 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner- Mukesh Pareek is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/88-90