Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21543 (KAR)

SRI JAYARAMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8956/2025 · 2025-07-10

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25366 WP No. 8956 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.8956 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI JAYARAMA S/O LATE NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT KARIVABANAHALLI VILLAGE, YASHAWANTHAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560058. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.N. VARADARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, K G ROAD, KANDHAYA BHAVANA, BENGALURU - 560009. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK OFFICE, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25366 WP No. 8956 of 2025 K G ROAD, KANDHAYA BHAVANA, BENGALURU - 560009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONDUCT PHODI OF THE LAND MEASURING 2 ACRES IN SY.NO.48/1 OF KARIVABANAHALLI VILLAGE, YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU ON THE APPLICATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER, A COPY OF WHICH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS HEREWITH PRODUCED AND MAKRED AS ANNEXURE-B EXPEDITIOUSLY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is to consider the request of the petitioner for conducting phody as - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25366 WP No. 8956 of 2025 per the application at Annexure-B, by the respondent - authorities. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate, the petitioner has made application through online seeking phody in respect of the subject land as per Annexure-B. 4. In that view of the matter, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation Annexure-B, expeditiously. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28