P. Shamsudeen v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, awps - Tiruchendur
CRL OP(MD)/18651/2025 · 2025-11-19
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 215404 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 215404 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD) NO. 18651 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP(MD) NO. 18651 of 2025 P.Shamsudeen S/o.Peer Mohamed Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Inspector Of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District. (Crime No.5/2025) 2.XXXXXXXXXX, Thoothukudi District. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Sheik Abdullah, Advocate For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 Mr.A.Arunachalam, Advocate for R2 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD) NO. 18651 of 2025 Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed to call for the records in Special.S.C.No.98 of 2025 on the file of the Special Court Exclusively case under POCSO Act, Thoothukudi and quash the same.
ORDER This petition is filed to quash the impugned final report in Spl.S.C.No.98 of 2025 on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Thoothukudi for the offences under Sections 5(n), 5(l), 6, 7, and 8 of Protection of Child from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 r/w. Section 351(2) of the BNS, 2023.
2. The gist of the allegation is that the petitioner, who is the father of the victim girl, had committed sexual intercourse on the victim girl, when she was a minor.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the allegations are false; that the victim girl has now filed an affidavit stating that she was compelled to give a complaint against her own father by her maternal uncle one P.M.Sheriff, and that the complaint given by her is false and therefore, the impugned proceedings may be quashed. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD) NO. 18651 of 2025
4. The memo of compromise and affidavit are taken on record. The victim girl is present before this Court and she has confirmed that she had given a false complaint.
5. It is seen that the provisions under POCSO Act are being misused to settle private disputes. This is one such case. Normally, this Court would have quashed the proceedings on the basis of such a statement as no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings. However, since the provisions have been misused at the instance of the victim's uncle one P.M.Sheriff, this Court is inclined to
order an enquiry on the said allegations.
6. Accordingly, the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi, shall conduct an enquiry to ascertain whether the complaint was lodged by the victim girl at the instance of the said P.M.Sheriff. If the Superintendent of Police, after conducting the enquiry, concludes that a false complaint was lodged at the said P.M.Sheriff's instance, he shall take severe action against him in accordance with law for instituting a false complaint. The 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD) NO. 18651 of 2025 Superintendent of Police shall file a status report before this Court on or before 16.12.2025.
7. Call the matter on 17.12.2025.
8. In the meanwhile, the proceedings before the trial Court shall remain stayed, and the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is also dispensed with. 19-11-2025 mkn To 1.The Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Thoothukudi. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi. 3.The Inspector Of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD) NO. 18651 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. mkn CRL OP(MD) NO. 18651 of 2025 19.11.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis