[2025:RJ-JP:23361] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7502/2025 Dayanand S/o Rishiprakash, Age About 38 Years, R/o Plot No. 2151, Babana Road, Purani Anaj Mandi, Police Station Narela, District Bahari, North Delhi. (At Present Central Jail Alwar). ----Applicant/Accused Versus State of Rajasthan Jaipur, through P.P. ----Non-Applicant For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vivek Sharma, P.P. Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P. Ms. Nidhi Khandelwal assisted by Ms. Anshu Kanwar Mr. Bhag Chand Bairwa HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Judgment / Order 19/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.0226/2025 registered at Police Station Kherli, District Alwar, for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2) & 61(2) (a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 20.05.2025; the offences are triable by the Magistrate. He further submits that compromise has been arrived at in between the present applicant and the complainant; the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, further custody of the applicant [2025:RJ-JP:23361] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7502/2025] would not serve any fruitful purpose, so, the applicant be released on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the aforesaid factum of compromise and hence, she has no objection to release of the applicant on bail. 5. Heard and considered the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant, and also the factum of compromise arrived at in between the present applicant and the complainant, the applicant is in custody since 20.05.2025, offences being triable by Magistrate, the trial will take considerable time and submission of the learned counsel for the complainant that she has no objection to release of the applicant on bail, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 7. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the accused-applicant Dayanand S/o Rishiprakash shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of ₹50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to [2025:RJ-JP:23361] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7502/2025] which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 8. The applicant shall not temper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J Manish/38