1 2025:CGHC:28612 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 690 of 2019 1 - Smt. Sadhana Singh W/o Shri Ashwani Singh Aged About 29 Years R/o Ranpurkala, Police Station- Gandhinagar, Tahsil- Lakhanpur, Civil And Revenue District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh. At Present R/o Chindiya, Police Station- Ramanujnagar, Tahsil- Lakhanpur, Civil And Revenue District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ku. Shristhi Singh D/o Shri Ashwani Singh Aged About 6 Years Petitioner No.02 Being Minor, Represented By Petitioner No. 01 Her Mother, R/o Ranpurkala, Police Station- Gandhinagar, Tahsil- Lakhanpur, Civil And Revenue District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh. At Present R/o Chindiya, Police Station- Ramanujnagar, Tahsil- Lakhanpur, Civil And Revenue District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus Ashwani Singh S/o Shri Akhilesh Singh(Shri Vijay Bahdur Singh) Aged About 30 Years Post- Govt. Servent- Constable (C.R.P.F.), R/o Ranpurkala, Post- Sukhri, Police Station- Gandhinagar, Tahsil- Lakhanpur, Civil And Revenue District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-applicant(s) For Applicants : None. For Non-applicant : None. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 27.06 .2025 . 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicants as well as non-applicant to press this revision on repeated calls. 2. By way of this revision, the applicants prayed for following relief:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present Revision-Petition setting aside the Impugned-Judgment/Order Dated 07/01/2019 passed by the Learned Family Court Ambikapur, Distt.-Suruguja (C.G.) in M.Cr.C.No.140/2017, further petitioners hereby prays for modifying the award to the tune of Rs.15,000/- per month maintenance award from the respondent herein U/Sec.125 of Cr.P.C., so to meet the end of Justice.” 3. From perusal of the record, it transpires that the instant criminal revision has been filed with 38 days of delay and till date delay has also not yet been condoned, it appears that the applicants have lost interest in pursuing the matter, due to efflux of time. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. 5. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal