[2025:RJ-JP:23998] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9255/2025 Daulat Singh S/o Shri Deshraj, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village And Post Chhonkarwara, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur- 321407 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health And Family Welfare And Panchayati Raj (Medical And Health) Department, Secretariat, Jaipur- 302005 2. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Bharatpur, Vikas Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 3. The Block Chief Medical Officer, Bhusawar Division, District Bharatpur, Bhusawar-321406 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sarthak Rastogi For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 01/07/2025 Although, it is prayed in the writ petition that the order impugned dated 16.05.2025 dispensing with services of the petitioner, a pharmacist appointed on urgent temporary basis, be quashed and set aside; but, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel contended if he is permitted to submit a representation with the respondents to consider his case in the light of an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 27.05.2025 passed in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & [2025:RJ-JP:23998] (2 of 3) [CW-9255/2025] Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.11074/2025. In the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra), this Court observed as under:- “Be that as it may, the petitioners may file their representation(s) with the concerned Chief Medical and Health Officers for redressal of their grievances. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider engagement/continuous of the petitioners on the post of Pharmacist, in case they feel that the services of the petitioners are required by them. The present writ petitions stand disposed of, accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed of, accordingly.” Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- 1. The petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. 2. The respondents are directed to consider the representation within a period of twelve [2025:RJ-JP:23998] (3 of 3) [CW-9255/2025] weeks from the date of its receipt in the light of observation made by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra). Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/48