Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2153 (HP)

MUKESH PANWAR v. JOGINDER CENTRAL-COOPERATIVE BANK LTD AND ANOTHER

CWP/5902/2025 · 2026-01-08

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5902 of 2025 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 8th January, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.5902 of 2025 Mukesh Panwar …..Petitioner Versus Jogindra Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.5906 of 2025 Shubham Gupta …..Petitioner Versus Jogindra Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No.7026 of 2025 Piyush Kumar Sharma …..Petitioner Versus Jogindra Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. CWP No.7028 of 2025 Bhupinder Kapoor …..Petitioner Versus Jogindra Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Anr. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vijay K Arora, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Hitansh Raj and Ms. Astha Kohli, Advocates in all the matters. For the Respondents: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1 in all the matters. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No.2- Stsate in all the matters. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Even though the respondents have not filed reply to the writ petitions, however, with consent of learned counsel for the parties, matters are taken up for disposal at this stage. 2. These writ petitions have been filed for grant of almost identical reliefs, which have been extracted from CWP No. 5902 of 2025: - “(i) That a writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued thereby quashing and setting aside office order dated 30.12.2024 (P-7), whereby pay of petitioner has been fixed in Level 3 (Cell 1) at Rs.20200/- Basic. (ii) That, a writ in the nature of mandamus may very kindly be issued thereby directing the respondent to fix the pay of the petitioner on his regularization as Executive 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 3 Assistant in Level 9 (Cell 1) at Rs. 35,600/- Basic which corresponding to initial level of pay band of 10300- 34800+3200 grade pay. (iii) That, the respondent be also directed to grant two increments to the petitioner earned by him during his contract service and thereafter, fix his pay in Level 9 (Cell 3) at Rs. 37,800/- and pay him all the arrears, incidental thereto.” 3. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that similar relief was prayed for in Neeraj Kumar Vs. Jogindra Central Co-Operative Bank Limited and Anr2. The said writ petition was disposed of on 18.09.2025, which order was further clarified on 01.01.2026 in CMP No.27801 of 2025 filed in the said case with direction to the Managing Director of the respondent-Jogindra Central Cooperative Bank Limited to constitute a committee for resolution of pay anomaly, if any, in the pay sale of regular/contractual employees, within a period of six weeks. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Bank submits that the respondent is in the process of constituting a Committee in terms of the directions issued in Neeraj Kumar2 and that the cases of present petitioners 2 CWP No.6325 of 2025 decided on 18.09.2025 4 being similar, are also required to be considered by the said Committee. Learned counsel for the petitioners is also agreeable to the above suggestion. Prayer has been made by learned counsel for both sides to dispose of the present writ petitions on the basis of directions issued in Neeraj Kumar2 . 5. Accordingly, the present writ petitions are also disposed of with the order that directions issued in Neeraj Kumar2 as clarified on 01.01.2026 shall mutatis mutandis apply to the present writ petitions as well. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 08, 2026 Judge R.Atal