Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21528 (RAJ)

DEEPAK KUMAR @ JITU S/O SURESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7590/2025 · 2025-06-20

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23390] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7590/2025 1. Deepak Kumar Allias Jitu S/o Suresh Kumar, Age About 21 Years, R/o Posana Police Station Gudhagodji District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Confined In Jail Jhunjhunu). 2. Hariram S/o Sarvan, Age About 28 Years, R/o Posana Police Station Gudhagodji District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Confined In Jail Jhunjhunu). 3. Vijendra S/o Shri Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Posana District Gudhagodji District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Confined In Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, P.P. Mr. Shivraj Chauhan through VC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 20/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.467/2024, registered with the Police Station Gudha District Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. 2. Heard. 3. Considered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners are in custody since 25.05.2025 and by the motivation [2025:RJ-JP:23390] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7590/2025] of the elders both the parties have entered into compromise. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 6. Learned counsel for the complainant appearing through video conferencing verifies the factum of compromise between the parties. 7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that parties have entered into a compromise, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J GAURAV/29