W.P(MD)No. 33057 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :19.11.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P(MD)No. 33057 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD) No.26063 of 2025 S.Balamurugan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruchendur, Tuticorin District. 2. The Tahsildar, Sathankulam Taluk, Tuticorin District. 3. The Regional Deputy Tahsildar, Sathankulam Taluk, Tuticorin District. 4. The Head Surveyor, Sathankulam Taluk, Tuticorin District. 5. The Village Administrative Officer, Kommadikottai, Tuticorin District. ... Respondents 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 33057 of 2025 PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertains to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in application No.2025/N103/28/022896, dated 05.06.2025, quash the same as illegal and consequently, direct the third respondent to issue separate patta to the petitioner on basis of the online application. For Petitioner : Mr.P.F. Ferlin Castro. For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader O R D E R An order dated 05.06.2025 of the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar is challenged in this Writ Petition primarily on the ground that the order is unreasoned. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the application for subdivision reflecting Application No.2025/N 105/28/004679. By contrast, he points out that the impugned order bears the Application No.2025/N103/28/022896. He also submits that no particulars are contained in the impugned order. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 33057 of 2025 3. Learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice for all the respondents. He submits that the matter may be remanded for fresh consideration. 4. On perusal of the impugned order, apart from the discrepancy relating to the application number, I find that the reason for rejection is recorded as “Gyj;jpy; vy;iyfs;/cupik njhlu;ghd gpur;rid cs;sJ'. No particulars are provided as to the nature of the title dispute or boundary dispute or whether both these issues are present as regards the petitioner's application. Being a completely unreasoned order, the order cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside. As a consequence, the matter is remanded to the Tahsildar for reconsideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and the other current pattadars, a speaking order shall be issued within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. This Writ Petition is disposed of on these terms. No costs. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 33057 of 2025 Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. NCS : Yes/No 19.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruchendur, Tuticorin District. 2. The Tahsildar, Sathankulam Taluk, Tuticorin District. 3. The Regional Deputy Tahsildar, Sathankulam Taluk, Tuticorin District. 4. The Head Surveyor, Sathankulam Taluk, Tuticorin District. 5. The Village Administrative Officer, Kommadikottai, Tuticorin District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No. 33057 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J. apd ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No. 33057 of 2025 19.11.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis