Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21527 (KAR)

SMT ANJINAMMA v. SMT NAGARATHNAMMA

CRL.RP/58/2017 · 2025-07-04

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24183 CRL.RP No. 58 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 58 OF 2017 BETWEEN: SMT ANJINAMMA W/O LATE ENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/AT No. 165, BEHIND GULPET POLICE QUARTERS CHIKKABALLAPUR ROAD KOLAR TOWN, KOLAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VISWANATH SETTY V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT NAGARATHNAMMA W/o B V VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT No.79, RAJARAJESHWARI BLOCK HEBBALA, BANGALORE UTTARA TALUK, BANGALORE. 2. SRI S ANAND S/o SRIKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, LAWER PROFESSION R/AT No. 208, 2ND CROSS ROAD HEBBALA, BANGALORE UTTARA TALUK, BANGALORE. 3. GULPET POLICE STATION KOLAR REP. BY ITS SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24183 CRL.RP No. 58 of 2017 DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S.JAYAPRAKASH NARAYAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI DIVAKAR MADDUR, HCGP FOR R3; POLICE REPORT NOT RECEIVED IN R/O R2) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.01.2016 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., KOLAR IN C.C.NO.535/2014 BY ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT No.1 AND 2 U/S 239 OF CR.P.C. AND FURTHER REJECT THE SAID APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT No.1 AND 2 AND BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE CRL.RP. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is present and submits that petitioner is not responding for calls. Considering the same it appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this revision petition. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE MR