Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21527 (AP)

A.VISWANATHA SARMA v. V.RAMA KRISHNA, I.R.S.,

CC/1470/2021 · 2025-04-17

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010305132021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: A.viswanatha Sarma V Rama Krishna I R S Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAMA SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. V K NAIDU The Court made the following: ORDER This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 24.03.2021 passed by this Court in Writ Petition vide W.P.No.6941 of 2021. Sri K.Rama Subba Rao, learned counsel, appeared submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case, had been complied with. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1470/2021 ...PETITIONER AND ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner: K RAMA SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor: The Court made the following: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 24.03.2021 passed by this Court in Writ Petition vide W.P.No.6941 of 2021. Sri K.Rama Subba Rao, learned counsel, appeared in virtual mode submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case, had been complied with. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...CONTEMNOR This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 24.03.2021 passed in virtual mode and submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this In view the above submission, nothing remains for adjudication and this Contempt Case can be closed. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J RR