- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:964 CRL.P No. 3883 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3883 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O LATE BASAVE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT MADHUGONAHALLI VILLAGE, HULIYURDURGA KUNIGAL - 572 130 TUMKUR DISTRICT 2. NAGESH K.S. @ N.S. GOWDA, S/O SHIVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS R/AT. GIDADA KENCHANAHALLI, HULIYURDURGA, KUNIGAL - 572 130 TUMKUR DISTRICT 3. CHANDRA @ CHANDRASHEAKAR C M S/O MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT CHOWDANAKUPPE VILLAGE, HULIYURDURGA, KUNIGAL - 572 130 TUMKUR DISTRICT 4. UMESHA S.S., S/O SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT. SINGONAHALLI VILLAGE, HULIYURDURGA, KUNIGAL - 572 130 TUMKUR DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA M.G., ADVOCATE (AB)) Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:964 CRL.P No. 3883 of 2021 AND: 1. STATE BY KUNIGAL P.S. KUNIGAL - 572 130 (REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001 2. SHIVANNA B.R., S/O RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT BEGUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL - 572 130 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO A. TO QUASH THE FIR AGAINST PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4 IN CR.NO.143/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNIGAL, TUMKURU DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 323, 307, 504, 506, 149 OF IPC. B. TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO PRODUCE THE CCTV FOOTAGES RECORDED BY THE C.C CAMERA OF THE INCIDENT PLACE GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, KUNIGAL. THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No representation. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:964 CRL.P No. 3883 of 2021 Even though notice is ordered to be issued on respondent No.2 vide order dated 09.12.2024, required PF with correct address for issuance of notice to respondent No.2 along with copy of annexures are not furnished. The order sheet dated 09.12.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. There is no representation. The petition is of the year 2021. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford a final opportunity, list after two weeks." Inspite of that there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2